Hello Andrew. Your piece about Stephen Conway and Makin is commendable, and needs a wider audience. It is depressing to see so much comment, some supposedly professional, that reads into Makin evidence that is not there, and which seems just keen to see heads roll. Can you draw your piece to the attenntion of Thinking Anglicans? And how do I provide a URL to it? Hugh
Hello Andrew. Your piece about Stephen Conway and Makin is commendable, and needs a wider audience. It is depressing to see so much comment, some supposedly professional, that reads into Makin evidence that is not there, and which seems just keen to see heads roll. Can you draw your piece to the attenntion of Thinking Anglicans? And how do I provide a URL to it? Hugh
I know that Sarmiento has seen it, so Thinking Anglicans should in due course. The URL is https://open.substack.com/pub/andrewbrown/p/stephen-conway-is-innocent-ok?r=3hvho&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
Really bad form . Graham and Makin should consult defamation lawyers.
Thanks. Typo..There is a brutal irony here. Graham, rather than Alasdair Quirk.
Can I share your blog on Facebook?
By all means share. Apologies for the typo. I was in a hurry to get it up on Sunday