So what's wrong with using plain, simple English? (Well, it might be clearly understood, and that might prove embarrassing.) We used to have a textbook in some branches of the civil service titled 'The Complete Plain Words' whose aim was to overcome the kind of jargon which is used to obfuscate the hearer / reader.
There's a further problem - Christians often use everyday words which they've endowed with very specialised meanings that other (ordinary?) mortals don't, and this doesn't help. Someone once asked if I truly believed I was degenerate; he got rather abrupt when I said I hoped not. Catch was, he was using the word in a spiritual, Calvinistic sense - ie morally and spiritually dead and degenerate unless I'd been 'born again' - without checking that I understood what he meant. I was using the word in the more common sense of being seriously morally lax. That wasn't the only time its happened!
But that is exactly what the church is aiming for (entirely misguidedly) — a process which concludes, algorithmically, and whose results no one can be held responsible for.
The two phrases are used when marking children's work by some schools. What went well, often abbreviated to WWW, ie what the child did a good job with, and then even better if, EBI, what they could have done to make the piece of work better. (Former primary school teacher)
So what's wrong with using plain, simple English? (Well, it might be clearly understood, and that might prove embarrassing.) We used to have a textbook in some branches of the civil service titled 'The Complete Plain Words' whose aim was to overcome the kind of jargon which is used to obfuscate the hearer / reader.
I think David Turnbull has answered that: when you are trying to lawyer-proof an accusation of bad conduct, obscurity is your friend.
There's a further problem - Christians often use everyday words which they've endowed with very specialised meanings that other (ordinary?) mortals don't, and this doesn't help. Someone once asked if I truly believed I was degenerate; he got rather abrupt when I said I hoped not. Catch was, he was using the word in a spiritual, Calvinistic sense - ie morally and spiritually dead and degenerate unless I'd been 'born again' - without checking that I understood what he meant. I was using the word in the more common sense of being seriously morally lax. That wasn't the only time its happened!
But that is exactly what the church is aiming for (entirely misguidedly) — a process which concludes, algorithmically, and whose results no one can be held responsible for.
OK. The school jargon absolutely defeated me.
The two phrases are used when marking children's work by some schools. What went well, often abbreviated to WWW, ie what the child did a good job with, and then even better if, EBI, what they could have done to make the piece of work better. (Former primary school teacher)
Ah. Thanks.
WWW: The shuttle launched successfully
EBI: It hadn't blown up shortly afterwards.
Like that?